- ABBYY FINEREADER 12 VS PAPERPORT 14 PDF MRC MAC OS X
- ABBYY FINEREADER 12 VS PAPERPORT 14 PDF MRC WINDOWS 7
- ABBYY FINEREADER 12 VS PAPERPORT 14 PDF MRC PROFESSIONAL
- ABBYY FINEREADER 12 VS PAPERPORT 14 PDF MRC MAC
- ABBYY FINEREADER 12 VS PAPERPORT 14 PDF MRC WINDOWS
Periodic and complex reporting in processes like revenue management or cost management, however, is where the spreadsheet model really starts to break down. “There’s a very little learning curve, you can effectively do whatever you want witll tlle data, and it works fairly well in smaller organizations.”
ABBYY FINEREADER 12 VS PAPERPORT 14 PDF MRC PROFESSIONAL
“Excel is probably tlle most comfortable environment for a lot of financial professionals,” AJok Ajmera, vice-president, professional services with Mississauga, Ont.-based Prophix Software, says. The appeal of tlle spreadsheet as the quickest way to get a report out is not hard to appreciate. As with any farniliar method, it finds its way into numerous situations where better alternatives are available, most significantly in its widespread use as a de facto reporting tool. It’s used for everything from preliminary su T he spreadsheet has become the virtual “slide rule” for CMAs. “There’s a very little learning curve, you can effectively do whatever you want with the data, and it works fairly well in smaller organizations.” “Excel is probably the most comfortable environment for a lot of financial professionals,” Alok Ajmera, vice-president, professional services withMississauga, Ont.-basedProphixSoftware, says. The appeal of the spreadsheet as the quickest way to get a report out is not hard to appreciate. As with any familiar method, it finds its way into numerous situations where better alternatives are available, mostsignificantly in itswidespread use as a de facto reporting tool. It’s used for everything from preliminary strategic plans to financial statements. The spreadsheet has become the virtual “slide rule” for CMAs.
ABBYY FINEREADER 12 VS PAPERPORT 14 PDF MRC WINDOWS
Let’s see how each of the packages did: ABBYY Windows With an astonishing 1.16 MB reduction in file size after OCR, Acrobat 9 with ClearScan is the winner.
ABBYY FINEREADER 12 VS PAPERPORT 14 PDF MRC MAC
Since they are different machines, you can’t directly compare the Windows and Mac times, but clearly in both cases Acrobat is faster. I used that as an additional test to see what the difference is. In Acrobat 9 there is a setting called ClearScan. I used these settings on both Windows and Mac.
I set the output style to “Searchable Image (Exact)” because leaving it just as Searchable Image in my experience has caused some weird things to happen with the resulting PDF. These were the settings for the Mac ABBYY, and I believe it is what ScanSnap Manager on Windows uses as well. I set Save Mode to “Text under page image” and Quality to High. There were essentially three configurations: ABBYY FineReader I tried not to do too many fancy settings to keep things as “real-life” as possible. In that test, I re-scanned with “Create Searchable PDF” checked in the ScanSnap Manager settings. If you know how, please leave a message in the comments.
Maybe I am blind, but I couldn’t figure out a way to run ABBYY FineReader for ScanSnap on Windows standalone.
Here’s some info on the document that I used: In all cases except one, I scanned without OCR so that I could run it standalone later. It probably would have been better to do this with a bunch of different documents to compare, but hey. I scanned a magazine article for this test. Yes, I realize that Adobe Acrobat X is out, but since I am not aware of any scanners that come bundled with it yet, I decided to stick with the versions that ship with the ScanSnap.
ABBYY FINEREADER 12 VS PAPERPORT 14 PDF MRC MAC OS X
ABBYY FINEREADER 12 VS PAPERPORT 14 PDF MRC WINDOWS 7
0 kommentar(er)
